Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Oncology Research and Treatment ; 43(Supplement 4):137, 2020.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2223826

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Patients (pts) with cancers undergoing treatment, especially patients with lung cancer are considered a high risk group for infection and potentially inferior outcome during the SarsCov2 epidemic. Currently no data have been published on the test rate, infection rate, effects on treatment and potential outcome. Here we first present data from CRISP addressing these questions. Method(s): CRISP (NCT02622581) is a prospective, observational, open, multicentre, interdisciplinary and intersectional clinical research platform that collects data on all (sequential) treatments, patient and tumour characteristics, biomarker testing, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in about 180 hospitals and ofce-based practices in Germany. Pts are recruited at start of treatment. In March 2020 data collection was updated regarding testing for SarsCov2, test results, efects on cancer treatment and outcome for all patients newly recruited, under observation or deceased afer March 1st 2020. Interim results as by June 17th have been summarised here and will be updated regarding further details with a data cut on August 31st 2020. Result(s): For a total of 465 pts the SarsCov2 variables have already been answered until data cut for this snapshot analysis. Of these a total of 139 pts (30%) had been tested for a SarsCov2 infection and 9 patients (2% and 6% of those tested) had been tested positive. Further results on the severity of symptoms at diagnosis, course of disease and consequences on the cancer treatment will be analysed and presented with an updated data cut when about 1000 pts are expected to have been documented. Conclusion(s): First data on SarsCov2 testing reveals that patients with lung cancer have access to testing and that positive cases have been identifed in the first months of the pandemic in Germany. While these first interim data have to be interpreted with caution regarding the overall percentages they proof that quick implementation of relevant new variables into existing cohort studies is feasible and important to address urgent questions regarding the care of cancer patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL